top of page
1.png
Sidebar01.png

Introduction

The State of Black Birth Equity in California Report, developed by the California Coalition for Black Birth Justice (the Coalition or CCBBJ), a statewide, Black woman-led organization dedicated to unifying and strengthening the Black birth justice movement in California, in order to support this broader reassessment. It offers a thorough examination of the movement's current needs and opportunities within today's political and social climate. Through a structured analysis of existing research, new primary sources of data, Black birth equity initiatives and organizations across the state, this report investigates the policy and power dynamics needed to drive change, as well as the readiness and support for institutional efforts.


We hope this analysis fosters a shared understanding of California's current position, its unique challenges, and the potential pathways for progress. We extend our deepest gratitude to the authors of the pivotal reports, papers, articles, documentaries, and social content that continue to enrich the birth justice knowledge base.

Main_Chp01.jpg

Over the past few years, the increasing focus on birth outcomes and experiences have brought about new studies and solutions. Given this expansion of data and research, The California Coalition for Black Birth Justice (the Coalition or CCBBJ) conducted a literature review to assess the contemporary state of research regarding Black birthing health outcomes, care quality, and untapped areas of exploration. 

In reviewing the literature, trends were categorized as “established”, “emergent”, or “rising” to reflect their prominence and evolution in the field of Black birth justice research. Established trends are those with a strong foundation in the literature, widely recognized by scholars and institutions, and central to shaping discourse and policy. The framing of racism—not race—as the root cause of maternal health disparities exemplifies this, having been solidified through years of scholarship and institutional acknowledgment. Emergent trends represent areas of growing focus that have gained momentum in recent years, expanding research methodologies and amplifying historically overlooked perspectives. The shift toward patient-reported experiences as a critical measure of care quality illustrates this, as researchers increasingly center Black birthing people’s voices in qualitative assessments. Rising trends signal the early stages of inquiry into innovative approaches with limited but promising research. The exploration of non-dominant models of care, including community-based birthing support and guaranteed income initiatives, are in the early stages of analysis, marking a potential shift in maternal health policy and practice.

Research Gaps

In reviewing the literature, a number of gaps became clear. While the introduction and establishment of the aforementioned trends represent progress, although not exhaustive, the following populations and subjects remain largely missing from the maternal and infant health research landscape.

Examples of missing populations include:
Those with substance use disorders (SUDs),

  • Gender expansive and transgender individuals,

  • Homeless individuals

  • Those with disabilities, and

  • Incarcerated/justice-involved individuals.  
     

Examples of missing subjects include:

  • Studies that explore the disaggregation of ‘Black’ identity,

  • Studies that measure the efficacy of driving change within institutions, and

  • Studies that chronicle midwifery and doula integration into existing systems

  • Infertility

  • Post-partum experience

 

Main_Chp02.jpg
Examining the Organizational and Policy Landscape for Birth Justice 

In the last several years, various national and California-based organizations, initiatives, and policies have emerged to address the Black maternal and infant health crisis. Growing awareness of disparities in care and outcomes has led to an increase of solution-focused strategies and approaches. In order to understand this ever-evolving landscape of organizations and polices, the Coalition compiled and analyzed over 77 organizations engaged in Black birth equity and justice work and over 45 legislative and administrative policies. 

Sidebar022.png
Approach

The Coalition sought to answer questions about the geographic spread of Black birth equity efforts, the range of approaches (e.g.- direct service provision, advocacy, education, research, community engagement, etc.), year of founding, and whether the organization or initiative is Black-led or founded. The team populated the organizational and policy tracker through existing knowledge of organizations, initiatives, and policies, comprehensive internet searches, fielding additions from the Coalition backbone team, and 2024 strategic advisor cohort. The collected data was verified through checking organizational websites and policy tracker web pages. The data was cleaned and checked for inconsistencies before analysis.   

Organizations Engaged in Black Birth Equity and Justice Work

At the time of initial analysis, the Coalition along with community partners identified 77 organizations engaged in Black birth equity and justice work (see Appendix B. for details). This list includes (n=6) national organizations and (n=71) California based organizations. The identified organizations represent a diverse set of regions and cities primarily within the state.

Chp2Fig1_Table_edited.jpg
CA Organizational Strategic Approach Landscape
Among all organizations (n=54) were Black founded and are Black led while (n=24) were not.
Chp2Fig2_Table.jpg
California Bills Related to Maternal, Child Health by status from 2019- 2025
Main_Chp03.jpg

The Importance of Understanding and Mapping Power to Advance Birth Equity 
The aim of this birth equity stakeholder power analysis is to demystify state and local power dynamics that influence the resources, experiences, and outcomes of Black people throughout the perinatal period and across the reproductive lifespan. As suggested in Camara Jones’ “A Gardner’s Tale”, it is essential to examine who has the power to decide, the power to act, and control of resources in order to address the root causes of inequitable outcomes (Jones, 2000). According to the Praxis Project, efforts that solely target the immediate conditions instead of transforming underlying systems rooted in bias and injustice will have limited impact.

The Grassroots Power Project defines power as the ability of marginalized communities to reshape their social and political landscape to reflect their needs and visions. Governing power extends beyond reactive actions or short-term efforts. It aims to build lasting influence over governance structures, driving transformative change that addresses racial, economic, and gender injustices. Governing power is about not only engaging with existing systems but fundamentally altering them to align with community values. 

Understanding Power Structures that Influence Birth Equity in California Using the Birth Equity Measurement Framework
To help frame the power analysis, we utilized the Birth Equity Measurement Framework developed by a team at the Praxis Project and the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). This evidence-based, community-informed framework serves as a guide for conceptualizing a range of factors that influence birth equity and accountability structures. At the center of the framework is the birthing person, surrounded by three rotating layers—stages of care, birth equity factors, and accountable entities.  
 

Birth Equity Measurement Framework

As it relates to birth equity and justice, those that hold the most visible, formal decision-making power are the entities that have legislative and economic authority, including the Governor of California, the California state legislature, various state government departments (e.g. CDPH, DHCS, etc.), philanthropy, hospitals and health systems, and insurance payers. Hidden power is driven by community-based organizations, advocates and birth workers, clinicians, research institutions, local health or public health jurisdictions, professional associations, and privately held businesses. Invisible power is advanced through media and can be influenced by all other entities.

The Faces of Power

While each entity identified in the Birth Equity Measurement Framework holds influence over advancing birth equity, it is crucial to note that entities hold varying types of power.  The Faces of Power framework, developed by Steven Lukes, describes three distinct ways power is exercised: visible power, hidden power, and invisible power. Visible power is related to formal decision-making through laws, policies, budgets, regulations and institutional rules. Hidden power influences the visible power and shapes what is prioritized and decided. Invisible power are the beliefs, ideology, social norms and culture that shape narratives and people’s ideas of what is normal, fair, and right. 

framework.png
PowerVisual.jpg
Main_Chp04.jpg

Examining Healthcare Institutional Readiness to Engage with Birth Equity

This is your About section. Every website has a story and users want to hear yours. This is a great opportunity to give a full background on who you are and what your site has to offer. Double click on the text box to edit the content and add all the information you want to share. You may like to talk about how you got started and share your professional journey. Explain your core values, your commitment to customers and how you stand out from the crowd. You can also add a photo, gallery or video for even more engagement.

Background01.jpg

Defining ‘Institutional Readiness’

The California Coalition for Black Birth Justice defines Institutional Readiness as the willingness, preparedness, and organizational capacity of a health care institutions (hospital, clinic, etc.) to meaningfully engage in, adopt, and sustain birth equity promoting quality improvement work. This baseline level of preparedness is a predictor of success in enacting and sustaining systems level change in service to improving racism-based disparities in care provision and outcomes. 

Approach

Design

We used a focus group design that included both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies to investigate clinician held perspectives on institutional readiness to engage in birth equity promoting quality improvement work.  

 

All focus groups were held virtually to ensure participation from clinicians across California. Separate virtual focus groups were held for the following professions: Physicians (MDs), Nurses (RNs), Certified Nurse Midwives (CNMs), and C-Suite/ Quality Improvement staff. 

Sidebar023.png
Institutional Readiness’ Assessment Poll Results

The levels of preparedness were defined by the following categories:

  • Not started;

  • Just beginning to explore;

  • Integrated practice;

  • Advanced Implementation;

  • Not Sure/ I Don’t Know.

Chp4Fig1_Table.jpg
Background01.jpg

Future Birth Equity Quality Improvement Project Ideas

Focus group participants were asked ‘what other Black patient specific birth equity promoting practices they would like to see implemented as it relates to maternity care provision within their institution?’ The following quality improvement project ideas were shared:

  1. Creating a structure for continual and consistent data analysis to pinpoint disparities as well as document progress. 

  2. Support the creation of more robust complaint and feedback mechanisms to increase accountability within healthcare systems. 

  3. Facilitate relationship strengthening through team building activities within clinical staff ranks and between clinical staff and Midwives/Doulas.

  4. Facilitate community partnerships to introduce more wrap around holistic care services.

  5. Use external incentives like designations/certifications to encourage health systems to engage in perinatal quality improvement work. 

  6. Expand quality improvement technical assistance services to outpatient clinics that serve birthing people.

  7. Center joy in quality improvement work to combat fear in clinical staff.

  8. Facilitate more robust provider education on implicit bias and racism in medicine by engaging in more role-play and simulations.

Main_Chp05.jpg
Background04.jpg

Exploring Clinic Readiness to Engage in Systems Change Work

Systems-level interventions in hospital care are effective in advancing Black perinatal equity, but these interventions are often limited to care that is provided during labor, birth, and the initial post-partum period only. Outpatient clinics provide long-term perinatal care, often from the first trimester of pregnancy through 6 weeks postpartum. Therefore, it is crucial to include pediatric ambulatory care services in intervention strategies, as this is where infants receive care from birth through age 18—including the critical first year of life, during which Black infants are 3-4 times more likely to experience mortality than white infants (March of Dimes).

 

Birth equity efforts have historically centered on the hospital experience—understandably so, as most births in California take place in hospitals. However, the Coalition recognizes that hospitals account for only a small portion of the time patients and families spend during pregnancy and postpartum. To advance birth equity, outpatient clinics providing prenatal, postpartum, and pediatric care must also be included. 

Approach

The Coalition conducted two observational clinic site visits in Los Angeles County and hosted a virtual clinic roundtable in the Fall of 2024 in order to explore approaches that increase clinic readiness to participate in systems change efforts to advance birth equity for Black families. During the site visits and roundtable discussion, the Coalition assessed current equity practices and opportunities for improvement by directly speaking with Black patients, Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC), Comprehensive Perinatal Services Program (CPSP), state-agency and other ambulatory care clinic staff. The following patient feedback and experiences were incredibly eye opening and aligned with what is well known about Black patient experiences in maternal healthcare. 

 

Key Take-Aways
From requiring clinics to participate in birth equity quality improvement efforts, to streamlining appointment and referral processes, removing insurance barriers to medical and community-based holistic care, and strengthening responses to patient grievances, there are numerous opportunities to advance birth equity for Black families within the outpatient clinic setting.

 

Continued birth equity work requires the addition of meaningful and direct engagement with outpatient clinics for assessment, education, training, and quality improvement opportunities designed to advance birth equity for Black families during all aspects of their clinic care, not isolated to the hospital experience. An additional key and often missing component of engagement in birth equity advancement includes insurance payers and managed care plans.

 

Both entities play a pivotal role in birth equity, but often are not included in conversations on how to improve access to care that families desire. The Coalition has identified the need for continued engagement with not only hospitals, but also outpatient clinics and insurance payers to determine the most effective ways to collaborate with all entities providing care for Black families during prenatal, hospital, postpartum, and pediatric care. Ultimately, the goal is to catalyze sustainable support structures to advance birth equity for Black families.

Main_Misc02.png
CONCLUSION
California holds the unique distinction of being the safest state to give birth, with the lowest maternal mortality and morbidity rates in the nation and is also among the safest states for infant health.

It is home to numerous organizations focused on or aligned with birth equity and justice and has successfully enacted several significant related laws and policies.  However, California continues to see disproportionately poorer outcomes and experiences of care for Black birthing people. With the recent untimely and preventable deaths of April Valentine and Bridgette Cromer in 2023, the work of addressing disparities in care and outcomes has never been more urgent.

 

Our examination of the literature suggests more work is necessary across multiple domains to achieve sustained progress. Published work in the field of birth equity and justice must broaden to include excluded communities, underexplored topics, and key areas for improvement. Although California is home to many community-based organizations deeply connected to the needs of families, these groups often lack the capacity and funding to conduct research, analyze data, and report on their own primary findings. Power imbalances between community-based organizations and state agencies remain a persistent challenge, highlighting the need for increased grassroots organizing—particularly to strengthen alternative sources of power within Black-led organizations. Our collection of primary data outlined within this landscape underscore specific needs for improvement in the clinical space across California. Our findings point to the need to secure protected time to engage in birth equity promoting work and more challenging and comprehensive trainings on implicit bias and racism in medicine. In addition to the statewide primary data collection, this landscape also includes Los Angeles-focused case study findings, but have far reaching implications for the policies and practices among perinatal clinics statewide.

 

In compiling the various data sources for this landscape analysis, we identified clear, persistent, and often hidden gaps. But where there are gaps, there are also opportunities. We encourage scholars, advocates, and community members to use these insights to inform their work and build upon existing tools to drive sustained, systems-level change.

Main_Misc03.jpg

Appendix A

Appendix B

Appendix C

APPENDICES

Main_References.jpg
  • Altman, M. R., McLemore, M. R., Oseguera, T., Lyndon, A., & Franck, L. S. (2020). Listening to Women: Recommendations from Women of Color to Improve Experiences in Pregnancy and Birth Care. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 65(4), 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13102

  • Anyiam, S., Woo, J., & Spencer, B. (2024). Listening to Black Women’s Perspectives of Birth Centers and Midwifery Care: Advocacy, Protection, and Empowerment. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 69(5), 653–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13635

  • Beldon, M. A., Clay, S. L., Uhr, S. D., Woolfolk, C. L., & Canton, I. J. (2025). Exposure to Racism and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes for Black Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 27(1), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-024-01641-2

  • Birthing Care Pathway Report. California Department of Health Care Services. February 2025. 

  • Boyd, R. W., Lindo, E. G., Weeks, L. D., & McLemore, M. R. (n.d.). On Racism: A New Standard For Publishing On Racial Health Inequities. https://doi.org/10.1377/forefront.20200630.939347

  • Centering Black Mothers in California: Insights into Racism, Health, and Well-being for Black Women and Infants. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health, Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Division; 2023

  • Chambers, B. D., Arega, H. A., Arabia, S. E., Taylor, B., Barron, R. G., Gates, B., Scruggs-Leach, L., Scott, K. A., & McLemore, M. R. (2021). Black Women’s Perspectives on Structural Racism across the Reproductive Lifespan: A Conceptual Framework for Measurement Development. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 25(3), 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-020-03074-3

  • Chambers, B. D., Fontenot, J., McKenzie-Sampson, S., Blebu, B. E., Edwards, B. N., Hutchings, N., Karasek, D., Coleman-Phox, K., Curry, V. C., & Kuppermann, M. (2023). “It was just one moment that I felt like I was being judged”: Pregnant and postpartum black Women’s experiences of personal and group-based racism during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 322, 115813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115813

  • Community-Based Models to Improve Maternal Health Outcomes and Promote Health Equity. (2021, March 4). https://doi.org/10.26099/6s6k-5330

  • Crear-Perry, J., Correa-de-Araujo, R., Lewis Johnson, T., McLemore, M. R., Neilson, E., & Wallace, M. (2021). Social and Structural Determinants of Health Inequities in Maternal Health. Journal of Women’s Health (2002), 30(2), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8882

  • De Ornelas, M., Harley, K. G., Davis, D., Gruver, A., Santana, D. C., Hayes, K., Tesfalul, M., & Wren, J. (2025). A Community-Centered and Antiracist Model of Whole-Person Perinatal Care: Beloved Birth Black Centering. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 70(3), 468–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13761

  • Geronimus AT, Hicken M, Keene D, Bound J. "Weathering" and age patterns of allostatic load scores among blacks and whites in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2006 May;96(5):826-33. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.060749. Epub 2005 Dec 27. PMID: 16380565; PMCID: PMC1470581.

  • Headen, I. E., Elovitz, M. A., Battarbee, A. N., Lo, J. O., & Debbink, M. P. (2022). Racism and perinatal health inequities research: Where we have been and where we should go. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 227(4), 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.033

  • Karasek, D., Williams, J. C., Taylor, M. A., De La Cruz, M. M., Arteaga, S., Bell, S., Castillo, E., Chand, M. A., Coats, A., Hubbard, E. M., Love-Goodlett, L., Powell, B., Spellen, S., Malawa, Z., & Gomez, A. M. (2025). Designing the First Pregnancy Guaranteed Income Program in the United States: Qualitative Needs Assessment and Human-Centered Design to Develop the Abundant Birth Project. JMIR Formative Research, 9, e60829. https://doi.org/10.2196/60829

  • Malawa, Z., Gaarde, J., & Spellen, S. (2021). Racism as a Root Cause Approach: A New Framework. Pediatrics, 147(1), e2020015602. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-015602

  • McLemore, M. R., Altman, M. R., Cooper, N., Williams, S., Rand, L., & Franck, L. (2018). Health care experiences of pregnant, birthing and postnatal women of color at risk for preterm birth. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 201, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.02.013

  • Oparah, Julia Chinyere et al. Battling over Birth : Black Women and the Maternal Health Care Crisis. Amarillo, Texas: Praeclarus Press, 2018. Print.

  • Sakala, C., Declercq, E.R., Turon, J.M., & Corry, M.P. (2018). Listening to Mothers in California: A Population-Based Survey of Women’s Childbearing Experiences, Full Survey Report. Washington, D.C.: National Partnership for Women & Families.

  • Scott, K. A., Britton, L., & McLemore, M. R. (2019). The Ethics of Perinatal Care for Black Women: Dismantling the Structural Racism in “Mother Blame” Narratives. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 33(2), 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1097/JPN.0000000000000394

  • Shunmuga Sundaram, C., Campbell, R., Ju, A., King, M. T., & Rutherford, C. (2022). Patient and healthcare provider perceptions on using patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in routine clinical care: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 6, 122. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00524-0

  • TEDx Talks (Director). (2014, July 10). Allegories on race and racism | Camara Jones | TEDxEmory [Video recording]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNhcY6fTyBM

  • van Daalen, K. R., Kaiser, J., Kebede, S., Cipriano, G., Maimouni, H., Olumese, E., Chui, A., Kuhn, I., & Oliver-Williams, C. (2022). Racial discrimination and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Global Health, 7(8), e009227. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009227

  • Vedam, S., Stoll, K., Taiwo, T. K., Rubashkin, N., Cheyney, M., Strauss, N., McLemore, M., Cadena, M., Nethery, E., Rushton, E., Schummers, L., Declercq, E., & the GVtM-US Steering Council. (2019). The Giving Voice to Mothers study: Inequity and mistreatment during pregnancy and childbirth in the United States. Reproductive Health, 16(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0729-2

  • Wallace, J., Hoehn-Velasco, L., Tilden, E., Dowd, B. E., Calvin, S., Jolles, D. R., Wright, J., & Stapleton, S. (2024). An alternative model of maternity care for low-risk birth: Maternal and neonatal outcomes utilizing the midwifery-based birth center model. Health Services Research, 59(1), e14222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14222

Your paragraph text.png
The California Coalition for Black Birth Justice is a statewide collective of birth equity and reproductive justice experts who are creating strategic, coordinated efforts to accelerate birth justice across California. The California Coalition for Black Birth Justice is fiscally sponsored by the Public Health Institute, an independent 501(c)3 nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting health, well-being, and quality of life, and was co-founded in partnership with the California Preterm Birth Initiative.
PTBi Logo Full - Dark grey - Orange-01_e
public-health-institute-phi-logo_edited_
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
©2023-2026, California Coalition for Black Birth Justice. All Rights Reserved.
bottom of page